[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13296146#comment-13296146
]
Hudson commented on HDFS-3389:
------------------------------
Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #1111 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/1111/])
Updated CHANGES.txt for HDFS-3408(BKJM : Namenode format fails, if there is
no BK root) And HDFS-3389(Document the BKJM usage in Namenode HA) (Revision
1350733)
Result = FAILURE
umamahesh :
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1350733
Files :
* /hadoop/common/trunk/hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/CHANGES.txt
> Document the BKJM usage in Namenode HA.
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-3389
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3389
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: name-node
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha, 3.0.0
> Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G
> Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G
> Fix For: 2.0.1-alpha, 3.0.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-3389-1.patch, HDFS-3389.diff, HDFS-3389.patch,
> HDFSHighAvailability.html
>
>
> As per the discussion in HDFS-234, We need clear documentation for BKJM usage
> in Namenode HA.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
