[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13402994#comment-13402994
 ] 

Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HDFS-3561:
-------------------------------------------

Yes, we have multiple level of fencings.

First fencing should happen at ZKFC level. Other place, will have Fencing at 
Shared storage level.
What if fencing logic check for IP reachability? If ip is reachable and not 
able to fence means fence failed, If IP itself is not reachable then, no way it 
can kill the remote node. At this case we may need to give chance to next level 
fencer (shared storage)?
If ZKFC itself ensure 100% fence then, why shared storage fencing is required? 
Am i missing something here?
                
> ZKFC retries for 45 times to connect to other NN during fencing when network 
> between NNs broken and standby Nn will not take over as active 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-3561
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3561
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: auto-failover
>            Reporter: suja s
>            Assignee: Vinay
>
> Scenario:
> Active NN on machine1
> Standby NN on machine2
> Machine1 is isolated from the network (machine1 network cable unplugged)
> After zk session timeout ZKFC at machine2 side gets notification that NN1 is 
> not there.
> ZKFC tries to failover NN2 as active.
> As part of this during fencing it tries to connect to machine1 and kill NN1. 
> (sshfence technique configured)
> This connection retry happens for 45 times( as it takes  
> ipc.client.connect.max.socket.retries)
> Also after that standby NN is not able to take over as active (because of 
> fencing failure).
> Suggestion: If ZKFC is not able to reach other NN for specified time/no of 
> retries it can consider that NN as dead and instruct the other NN to take 
> over as active as there is no chance of the other NN (NN1) retaining its 
> state as active after zk session timeout when its isolated from network
> From ZKFC log:
> {noformat}
> 2012-06-21 17:46:14,378 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect 
> to server: HOST-xx-xx-xx-102/xx.xx.xx.102:65110. Already tried 22 time(s).
> 2012-06-21 17:46:35,378 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect 
> to server: HOST-xx-xx-xx-102/xx.xx.xx.102:65110. Already tried 23 time(s).
> 2012-06-21 17:46:56,378 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect 
> to server: HOST-xx-xx-xx-102/xx.xx.xx.102:65110. Already tried 24 time(s).
> 2012-06-21 17:47:17,378 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect 
> to server: HOST-xx-xx-xx-102/xx.xx.xx.102:65110. Already tried 25 time(s).
> 2012-06-21 17:47:38,382 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect 
> to server: HOST-xx-xx-xx-102/xx.xx.xx.102:65110. Already tried 26 time(s).
> 2012-06-21 17:47:59,382 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect 
> to server: HOST-xx-xx-xx-102/xx.xx.xx.102:65110. Already tried 27 time(s).
> 2012-06-21 17:48:20,386 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect 
> to server: HOST-xx-xx-xx-102/xx.xx.xx.102:65110. Already tried 28 time(s).
> 2012-06-21 17:48:41,386 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect 
> to server: HOST-xx-xx-xx-102/xx.xx.xx.102:65110. Already tried 29 time(s).
> 2012-06-21 17:49:02,386 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect 
> to server: HOST-xx-xx-xx-102/xx.xx.xx.102:65110. Already tried 30 time(s).
> 2012-06-21 17:49:23,386 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect 
> to server: HOST-xx-xx-xx-102/xx.xx.xx.102:65110. Already tried 31 time(s).
> {noformat}
>  

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to