[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3828?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13439929#comment-13439929
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-3828:
---------------------------------
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12542033/hdfs-3828-1.txt
against trunk revision .
+1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 tests included. The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files.
+1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac
compiler warnings.
+1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
+1 eclipse:eclipse. The patch built with eclipse:eclipse.
-1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 2 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9)
warnings.
+1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of
release audit warnings.
-1 core tests. The patch failed these unit tests in
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs:
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.TestFileConcurrentReader
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.blockmanagement.TestOverReplicatedBlocks
+1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/3071//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/3071//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshadoop-hdfs.html
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/3071//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Block Scanner rescans blocks too frequently
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-3828
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3828
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.23.0, 2.0.0-alpha
> Reporter: Andy Isaacson
> Assignee: Andy Isaacson
> Attachments: hdfs-3828-1.txt, hdfs3828.txt
>
>
> Branching off from HDFS-3194:
> Andy said:
> {quote}
> There is still an issue here even with the patch from hdfs-3194-1.txt.
> Running on a cluster with just one block we now see
> {noformat}
> 2012-08-16 15:59:57,884 INFO datanode.BlockPoolSliceScanner
> (BlockPoolSliceScanner.java:verifyBlock(391)) - Verification succeeded for
> BP-2101131164-172.29.122.91-1337906886255:blk_7919273167187535506_4915
> 2012-08-16 16:00:07,904 INFO datanode.BlockPoolSliceScanner
> (BlockPoolSliceScanner.java:verifyBlock(391)) - Verification succeeded for
> BP-2101131164-172.29.122.91-1337906886255:blk_7919273167187535506_4915
> 2012-08-16 16:00:17,925 INFO datanode.BlockPoolSliceScanner
> (BlockPoolSliceScanner.java:verifyBlock(391)) - Verification succeeded for
> BP-2101131164-172.29.122.91-1337906886255:blk_7919273167187535506_4915
> {noformat}
> {quote}
> Uma said:
> bq. Latest patch from Amith should address this issue.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira