[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13450904#comment-13450904
 ] 

Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-3898:
-----------------------------------

Right, Nagle's algorithm applies to all packets. But the bad 
(40ms-latency-causing) interaction between Nagle's Algorithm and Delayed ACK 
only applies when you have an even number of packets in a message (I think? or 
is it odd? it's complicated and I can't ever remember). The following page 
(coincidentally by the author of my favorite computer game ever) is pretty good 
at describing the issue: http://www.stuartcheshire.org/papers/NagleDelayedAck/
                
> QJM: enable TCP_NODELAY for IPC
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-3898
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3898
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>    Affects Versions: QuorumJournalManager (HDFS-3077)
>            Reporter: Todd Lipcon
>            Assignee: Todd Lipcon
>            Priority: Blocker
>         Attachments: hdfs-3898.txt
>
>
> Currently, if the size of the edits batches is larger than the MTU, it can 
> result in 40ms delays due to interaction between nagle's algorithm and 
> delayed ack. Enabling TCP_NODELAY on the sockets solves this issue, so we 
> should set those configs by default for all of the QJM-related IPC.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to