[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13453450#comment-13453450
]
Eli Collins commented on HDFS-2631:
-----------------------------------
Isn't the plan to make libwebhdfs compatible with libhdfs and then fuse-dfs can
work with either libhdfs or libwebhdfs? I think we should keep the default to
libhdfs since it's more stable and we've got a lot of users on it.
> Rewrite fuse-dfs to use libwebhdfs
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-2631
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2631
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: webhdfs
> Reporter: Eli Collins
> Assignee: Jing Zhao
> Attachments: HDFS-2631.1.patch, HDFS-2631.patch
>
>
> We should port the implementation of fuse-dfs to use the webhdfs protocol.
> This has a number of benefits:
> * Compatibility - allows a single fuse client to work across server versions
> * Works with both WebHDFS and Hoop since they are protocol compatible
> * Removes the overhead related to libhdfs (forking a jvm)
> * Makes it easier to support features like security
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
