[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13453495#comment-13453495
 ] 

Suresh Srinivas commented on HDFS-2631:
---------------------------------------

Eli, thanks for updating the summary. 

bq. One of the things that made HDFS-2656 hard to follow is that no target 
version was set so it was hard to see what release the change was intended for. 
Not sure I understand this comment and why it was hard to follow. When nothing 
is provided in these fields is it not intended for trunk?
                
> Add optional libwebhdfs support to fuse-dfs
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-2631
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2631
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: fuse-dfs, webhdfs
>            Reporter: Eli Collins
>            Assignee: Jing Zhao
>         Attachments: HDFS-2631.1.patch, HDFS-2631.patch
>
>
> We should port the implementation of fuse-dfs to use the webhdfs protocol. 
> This has a number of benefits:
> * Compatibility - allows a single fuse client to work across server versions
> * Works with both WebHDFS and Hoop since they are protocol compatible
> * Removes the overhead related to libhdfs (forking a jvm)
> * Makes it easier to support features like security

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to