[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13499327#comment-13499327
]
Konstantin Shvachko commented on HDFS-4179:
-------------------------------------------
> I was complaining that the general community doesn't seem interested in
> maintaining the code.
Just to remind, this is the exact wording you used:
["Konstantin: ... Even if you are using the BN in an older version or a private
fork, it is clear that you aren't maintaining it in current
releases."|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4114?focusedCommentId=13488914&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13488914]
I disagree with you on both issues of a single committer contribution and the
reasons we do code reviews. But I would rather stick to the essence of the jira
that is fixing the BackupNode.
You did not answer my question. But if you are not interested in helping, then
what are these lottery and Hawaii all about.
> BackupNode: allow reads, fix checkpointing, safeMode
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-4179
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4179
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: name-node
> Affects Versions: 2.0.2-alpha
> Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko
> Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko
> Attachments: BNAllowReads.patch
>
>
> BackupNode should be allowed to accept read command. Needs some adjustments
> in checkpointing and with safe mode.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
