[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13540224#comment-13540224
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-4338:
---------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12562511/hdfs-4338.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 1 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any 
warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}.  The patch built with 
eclipse:eclipse.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests in 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs:

                  
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.blockmanagement.TestBlocksWithNotEnoughRacks

    {color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/3699//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/3699//console

This message is automatically generated.
                
> TestNameNodeMetrics#testCorruptBlock is flaky
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-4338
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4338
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: namenode
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Andrew Wang
>            Assignee: Andrew Wang
>         Attachments: corruptblock, corruptblock.out, hdfs-4338.patch
>
>
> Ran some background cpuburn threads, got this stack trace:
> {noformat}
> Running org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metrics.TestNameNodeMetrics
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 15.287 sec 
> <<< FAILURE!
> testCorruptBlock(org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metrics.TestNameNodeMetrics)
>   Time elapsed: 14922 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: Bad value for metric ScheduledReplicationBlocks 
> expected:<1> but was:<0>
>       at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
>       at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:645)
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126)
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:470)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.test.MetricsAsserts.assertGauge(MetricsAsserts.java:190)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metrics.TestNameNodeMetrics.testCorruptBlock(TestNameNodeMetrics.java:229)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runNotIgnored(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:79)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:71)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:49)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:242)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:137)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:112)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:115)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:75)
> Results :
> Failed tests:   
> testCorruptBlock(org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metrics.TestNameNodeMetrics):
>  Bad value for metric ScheduledReplicationBlocks expected:<1> but was:<0>
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
> {noformat}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to