[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572954#comment-13572954
]
Suresh Srinivas commented on HDFS-4258:
---------------------------------------
Sorry I misunderstood the previous comment you had posted. So you are okay
using INodeID in checkLease() to solve this bug.
bq. The concern that I have is that introducing INode IDs doesn't seem like
it's strictly required to address the bug described by this JIRA,
If I understand it correctly, I agree with moving some of the subtasks to
another umbrella jira that goes some thing like "Use InodeID as as an
identifier for a file in HDFS protocols" and move some of the subtasks of this
jira under that. We could also add description of what needs to be done and
motivations.
Agree?
> Rename of Being Written Files
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-4258
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4258
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: hdfs-client, namenode
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0
> Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE
> Assignee: Brandon Li
> Attachments: HDFS-4258.patch, HDFS-4258.patch, HDFS-4258.patch,
> HDFS-4258.patch
>
>
> When a being written file or it's ancestor directories is renamed, the path
> in the file lease is also renamed. Then the writer of the file usually will
> fail since the file path in the writer is not updated.
> Moreover, I think there is a bug as follow:
> # Client writes 0's to F_0="/foo/file" and writes 1's to F_1="/bar/file" at
> the same time.
> # Rename /bar to /baz
> # Rename /foo to /bar
> Then, writing to F_0 will fail since /foo/file does not exist anymore but
> writing to F_1 may succeed since /bar/file exits as a different file. In
> such case, the content of /bar/file could be partly 0's and partly 1's.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
