[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13596370#comment-13596370
]
Suresh Srinivas commented on HDFS-4569:
---------------------------------------
bq. We've hit the default timeout with somewhat large fsimages, in the 2GB+
range.
I am surprised default of 1 minute was chosen. If a default of 10 minutes is
chosen, it should have been okay for HDFS-1490, given it is trying to solve
issues related to rare problems, right? Perhaps this can be done in another
jira.
A minor comment for the patch - just like "dfs.image.transfer.timeout" points
to "dfs.image.transfer.bandwidthPerSec" in description, should there be a
description in bandwidthPerSec to point to transfer.timeout?
> Small image transfer related cleanups.
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-4569
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4569
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 2.0.3-alpha
> Reporter: Andrew Wang
> Assignee: Andrew Wang
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: hdfs-4569-1.patch, hdfs-4569-2.patch
>
>
> The initial patch in HDFS-1490 has a couple small errors. It missed adding
> the new configuration key "dfs.image.transfer.timeout" to the
> hdfs-default.xml, and kept an explanatory comment from an earlier version of
> the patch that is no longer correct.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
