[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13609902#comment-13609902
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-4305:
---------------------------------
{color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12574943/hdfs-4305-1.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 1 new
or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 tests included appear to have a timeout.{color}
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs.
{color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/4135//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/4135//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Add a configurable limit on number of blocks per file, and min block size
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-4305
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4305
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: namenode
> Affects Versions: 1.0.4, 3.0.0, 2.0.2-alpha
> Reporter: Todd Lipcon
> Assignee: Andrew Wang
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: hdfs-4305-1.patch
>
>
> We recently had an issue where a user set the block size very very low and
> managed to create a single file with hundreds of thousands of blocks. This
> caused problems with the edit log since the OP_ADD op was so large
> (HDFS-4304). I imagine it could also cause efficiency issues in the NN. To
> prevent users from making such mistakes, we should:
> - introduce a configurable minimum block size, below which requests are
> rejected
> - introduce a configurable maximum number of blocks per file, above which
> requests to add another block are rejected (with a suitably high default as
> to not prevent legitimate large files)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
