[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13617547#comment-13617547
]
Lohit Vijayarenu commented on HDFS-2843:
----------------------------------------
Isn't this considered incompatible change?
{code}
- required StorageInfoProto storageInfo = 3; // Node information
+ required NodeInfoProto nodeInfo = 3; // Node information
{code}
Protobuf suggest you add newer elements, but I also see that StorageInfoProto
was already declared as required. I do not understand how would this affect on
disk format vs newer code reading it, but it sure looks like incompatible
change.
> Rename protobuf message StorageInfoProto to NodeInfoProto
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-2843
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2843
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: datanode, namenode
> Reporter: Suresh Srinivas
> Assignee: Suresh Srinivas
> Attachments: HDFS-2843.patch
>
>
> StorageInfoProto has cTime, layoutVersion, namespaceID and clusterID. This is
> really information of a node that is part of the cluster, such as Namenode,
> Standby/Secondary/Backup/Checkpointer and datanodes. To reflect this, I want
> to rename it as NodeInfoProto from StorageInfoProto.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
