[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13619631#comment-13619631
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-4660:
---------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12576518/HDFS-4660.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests in
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs:
org.apache.hadoop.fs.TestFcHdfsSymlink
{color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/4179//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/4179//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Duplicated checksum on DN in a recovered pipeline
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-4660
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4660
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: datanode
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 2.0.3-alpha
> Reporter: PengZhang
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: HDFS-4660.patch
>
>
> pipeline DN1 DN2 DN3
> stop DN2
> Add a node DN4 in 2nd position in pipeline
> DN1 DN4 DN3
> recover RBW
> DN4 after recover rbw
> 2013-04-01 21:02:31,570 INFO
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.FsDatasetImpl: Recover
> RBW replica
> BP-325305253-10.2.201.14-1364820083462:blk_-9076133543772600337_1004
> 2013-04-01 21:02:31,570 INFO
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.FsDatasetImpl:
> Recovering ReplicaBeingWritten, blk_-9076133543772600337_1004, RBW
> getNumBytes() = 134144
> getBytesOnDisk() = 134144
> getVisibleLength()= 134144
> end at chunk (134144/512=262)
> DN3 after recover rbw
> 2013-04-01 21:02:31,575 INFO
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.FsDatasetImpl: Recover
> RBW replica
> BP-325305253-10.2.201.14-1364820083462:blk_-9076133543772600337_10042013-04-01
> 21:02:31,575 INFO
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.FsDatasetImpl:
> Recovering ReplicaBeingWritten, blk_-9076133543772600337_1004, RBW
> getNumBytes() = 134028
> getBytesOnDisk() = 134028
> getVisibleLength()= 134028
> client send packet after recover pipeline
> offset=133632 len=1008
> DN4 after flush
> 2013-04-01 21:02:31,779 DEBUG
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: FlushOrsync, file
> offset:134640; meta offset:1063
> // meta end position should be floor(134640/512)*4 + 7 == 1059, but now it is
> 1063.
> DN3 after flush
> 2013-04-01 21:02:31,782 DEBUG
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: PacketResponder:
> BP-325305253-10.2.201.14-1364820083462:blk_-9076133543772600337_1005,
> type=LAST_IN_PIPELINE, downstreams=0:[]: enqueue Packet(seqno=219,
> lastPacketInBlock=false, offsetInBlock=134640,
> ackEnqueueNanoTime=8817026136871545)
> 2013-04-01 21:02:31,782 DEBUG
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.FsDatasetImpl: Changing
> meta file offset of block
> BP-325305253-10.2.201.14-1364820083462:blk_-9076133543772600337_1005 from
> 1055 to 1051
> 2013-04-01 21:02:31,782 DEBUG
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: FlushOrsync, file
> offset:134640; meta offset:1059
> After checking meta on DN4, I found checksum of chunk 262 is duplicated, but
> data not.
> Later after block was finalized, DN4's scanner detected bad block, and then
> reported it to NM. NM send a command to delete this block, and replicate this
> block from other DN in pipeline to satisfy duplication num.
> I think this is because in BlockReceiver it skips data bytes already written,
> but not skips checksum bytes already written. And function
> adjustCrcFilePosition is only used for last non-completed chunk, but
> not for this situation.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
