[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13663414#comment-13663414
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-4677:
---------------------------------
{color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12584057/HDFS-4677.3.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 6 new
or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs.
{color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/4421//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/4421//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Editlog should support synchronous writes
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-4677
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4677
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 1-win
> Reporter: Ivan Mitic
> Assignee: Ivan Mitic
> Attachments: HDFS-4677.2.patch, HDFS-4677.3.patch, HDFS-4677.patch
>
>
> In the current implementation, NameNode editlog performs syncs to the
> persistent storage using the {{FileChannel#force}} Java APIs. This API is
> documented to be slower compared to an alternative where {{RandomAccessFile}}
> is opened with "rws" flags (synchronous writes).
> We instrumented {{FileChannel#force}} on Windows and it some
> software/hardware configurations it can perform significantly slower than the
> “rws” alternative.
> In terms of the Windows APIs, FileChannel#force internally calls
> [FlushFileBuffers|http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa364439(v=vs.85).aspx]
> while RandomAccessFile (“rws”) opens the file with the
> [FILE_FLAG_WRITE_THROUGH flag|http://support.microsoft.com/kb/99794].
> With this Jira I'd like to introduce a flag that provide means to configure
> NameNode to use synchronous writes. There is a catch though, the behavior of
> the "rws" flags is platform and hardware specific and might not provide the
> same level of guarantees as {{FileChannel#force}} w.r.t. flushing the on-disk
> cache. This is an expert level setting, and it should be documented as such.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
