[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arpit Agarwal updated HDFS-4988:
--------------------------------

    Attachment: HDFS-4988.09.patch

{quote}
So, for the newly added datanodeID/storageID, I suggest to use 
datanodeUuid/storageUuid instead of renaming them later.
{quote}
I don't feel strongly about it either. Whichever one makes reviewing easy is 
fine by me. Although {{FsVolumeSpi#getStorageID}} method looks redundant. 
{{getStorageID}} is only called on known {{FsVolumeImpl}} objects so I just 
removed it. The other place is in StorageDirectory where I updated it to 
StorageUuid.

{quote}
Could you add TODO comments in the code if we don't have it yet?
{quote}
Done, will file Jiras soon.

{quote}
the following new added code in setFieldsFromProperties() in DataStorage.java 
are actually removing verification of storageID (now is DatanodeUUID) that from 
VERSION file. Do we think this is unnecessary now?
{quote}
Junping, sorry for missing your comment and thanks for catching the bug! Can 
you verify the updated patch addresses your comment?
                
> Datanode must support all the volumes as individual storages
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-4988
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4988
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: datanode
>            Reporter: Suresh Srinivas
>            Assignee: Arpit Agarwal
>         Attachments: HDFS-4988.01.patch, HDFS-4988.02.patch, 
> HDFS-4988.05.patch, HDFS-4988.06.patch, HDFS-4988.07.patch, 
> HDFS-4988.08.patch, HDFS-4988.09.patch
>
>
> Currently all the volumes on datanode is reported as a single storage. This 
> change proposes reporting them as individual storage. This requires:
> # A unique storage ID for each storage
> #* This needs to be generated during formatting
> # There should be an option to allow existing disks to be reported as single 
> storage unit for backward compatibility.
> # A functionality is also needed to split the existing all volumes as single 
> storage unit to to individual storage units.
> # -Configuration must allow for each storage unit a storage type attribute. 
> (Now HDFS-5000)-
> # Block reports must be sent on a per storage basis. In some cases (such 
> memory tier) block reports may need to be sent more frequently. That means 
> block reporting period must be on a per storage type basis.
> My proposal is for new clusters to configure volumes by default as separate 
> storage unit. Lets discuss.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to