[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13810896#comment-13810896
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-5037:
---------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12611500/hdfs-5037-2.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 1 new
or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:red}-1 release audit{color}. The applied patch generated 1
release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs.
{color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/5319//testReport/
Release audit warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/5319//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/patchReleaseAuditProblems.txt
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/5319//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Active NN should trigger its own edit log rolls
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-5037
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5037
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: ha, namenode
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 2.1.0-beta
> Reporter: Todd Lipcon
> Assignee: Andrew Wang
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: hdfs-5037-1.patch, hdfs-5037-2.patch, hdfs-5037-3.patch
>
>
> We've seen cases where the SBN/2NN went down, and then users accumulated very
> very large edit log segments. This causes a slow startup time because the
> last edit log segment must be read fully to recover it before the NN can
> start up again. Additionally, in the case of QJM, it can trigger timeouts on
> recovery or edit log syncing because the very-large segment has to get
> processed within a certain time bound.
> We could easily improve this by having the NN trigger its own edit log rolls
> on a configurable size (eg every 256MB)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
