[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13811766#comment-13811766
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-5449:
---------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12611697/HDFS-5449.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs.
{color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/5324//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/5324//console
This message is automatically generated.
> WebHdfs compatibility broken between 2.2 and 1.x / 23.x
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-5449
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5449
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Kihwal Lee
> Assignee: Kihwal Lee
> Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: HDFS-5449.patch, HDFS-5449.patch
>
>
> Similarly to HDFS-5403, getFileBlockLocations() fail between old (1.x,
> 0.23.x) and new (2.x), but this is worse since both directions won't work.
> This is caused by the removal of "name" field from the serialized json format
> of DatanodeInfo.
> 2.x namenode should include "name" (ip:port) in the response and 2.x webhdfs
> client should use "name", if "ipAddr" and "xferPort" don't exist in the
> response.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
