[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13886083#comment-13886083
 ] 

Jing Zhao commented on HDFS-5399:
---------------------------------

bq. even though it's received sufficient block reports to cause it to leave 
safemode
I'm not sure about this "even though" part, because we did not see 
corresponding log in our test.

bq. I don't think this is possible. The EditLogTailer only takes the FSN lock 
when it wakes up periodically to tail edits.
What if a lot of file creation/deletion requests keep coming? If the editlog 
keeps growing, is it possible that the SBN keeps tailing the editlog in a 
single session and cannot get a change to go back to sleep?

> Revisit SafeModeException and corresponding retry policies
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-5399
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5399
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Jing Zhao
>            Assignee: Jing Zhao
>
> Currently for NN SafeMode, we have the following corresponding retry policies:
> # In non-HA setup, for certain API call ("create"), the client will retry if 
> the NN is in SafeMode. Specifically, the client side's RPC adopts 
> MultipleLinearRandomRetry policy for a wrapped SafeModeException when retry 
> is enabled.
> # In HA setup, the client will retry if the NN is Active and in SafeMode. 
> Specifically, the SafeModeException is wrapped as a RetriableException in the 
> server side. Client side's RPC uses FailoverOnNetworkExceptionRetry policy 
> which recognizes RetriableException (see HDFS-5291).
> There are several possible issues in the current implementation:
> # The NN SafeMode can be a "Manual" SafeMode (i.e., started by administrator 
> through CLI), and the clients may not want to retry on this type of SafeMode.
> # Client may want to retry on other API calls in non-HA setup.
> # We should have a single generic strategy to address the mapping between 
> SafeMode and retry policy for both HA and non-HA setup. A possible 
> straightforward solution is to always wrap the SafeModeException in the 
> RetriableException to indicate that the clients should retry.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to