[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13998612#comment-13998612
]
Akira AJISAKA commented on HDFS-6263:
-------------------------------------
Hi [~abutala], thanks for the patch. +1 (non-binding).
bq. Is this by mistake? Should I just remove the redundant definitions? Please
advise. Thanks!
I think it's a mistake. Let's file a JIRA and remove the redundant definitions.
Thanks again for the report.
> Remove DRFA.MaxBackupIndex config from log4j.properties
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-6263
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6263
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Test
> Affects Versions: 2.4.0
> Reporter: Akira AJISAKA
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: newbie
> Attachments: HDFS-6263.patch
>
>
> HDFS-side of HADOOP-10525.
> {code}
> # uncomment the next line to limit number of backup files
> # log4j.appender.ROLLINGFILE.MaxBackupIndex=10
> {code}
> In hadoop-hdfs/src/contrib/bkjournal/src/test/resources/log4j.properties, the
> above lines should be removed because the appender (DRFA) doesn't support
> MaxBackupIndex config.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
