[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14002290#comment-14002290
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6420:
---------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12645290/HDFS-6420.000.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests in
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs:
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestCacheDirectives
{color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/6934//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/6934//console
This message is automatically generated.
> DFSAdmin#refreshNodes should be sent to both NameNodes in HA setup
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-6420
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6420
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Jing Zhao
> Assignee: Jing Zhao
> Attachments: HDFS-6420.000.patch
>
>
> Currently in HA setup (with logical URI), the DFSAdmin#refreshNodes command
> is sent to the NameNode first specified in the configuration by default.
> Users can use "-fs" option to specify which NN to connect to, but in this
> case, they usually need to send two separate commands. We should let
> refreshNodes be sent to both NameNodes by default.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
