[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14040287#comment-14040287
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6587:
---------------------------------

{color:green}+1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12651886/patch_TestBPOfferService.txt
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 1 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  There were no new javadoc warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}.  The patch built with 
eclipse:eclipse.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs.

    {color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/7205//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/7205//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Bug in TestBPOfferService blocks the trunk build
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6587
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6587
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Zhilei Xu
>            Assignee: Zhilei Xu
>            Priority: Blocker
>              Labels: patch
>         Attachments: patch_TestBPOfferService.txt
>
>
> need to fix a bug in TestBPOfferService#waitForBlockReceived that fails the 
> trunk, e.g. in Build #1781.
> Details: in this test, the utility function waitForBlockReceived() has a bug:
> parameter mockNN is never used but hard-coded mockNN1 is used.
> This bug introduces undeterministic test failure when 
> testBasicFunctionality() calls
> ret = waitForBlockReceived(FAKE_BLOCK, mockNN2);
> and the call finishes before the actual interaction with mockNN2 happens.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to