[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14044492#comment-14044492
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-5369:
---------------------------------
{color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12652521/HDFS-5369.000.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 1 new
or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common.
{color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/7236//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/7236//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Support negative caching of user-group mapping
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-5369
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5369
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: namenode
> Affects Versions: 2.2.0
> Reporter: Andrew Wang
> Assignee: Lei (Eddy) Xu
> Attachments: HDFS-5369.000.patch
>
>
> We've seen a situation at a couple of our customers where interactions from
> an unknown user leads to a high-rate of group mapping calls. In one case,
> this was happening at a rate of 450 calls per second with the shell-based
> group mapping, enough to severely impact overall namenode performance and
> also leading to large amounts of log spam (prints a stack trace each time).
> Let's consider negative caching of group mapping, as well as quashing the
> rate of this log message.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
