[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14048905#comment-14048905
]
Rakesh R commented on HDFS-4286:
--------------------------------
Thanks [~umamaheswararao] for the review.
oops its my mistake!, Actually it should be like:
{code}
+ the dependency bookkeeper-server jar would be generated under
+ hadoop-hdfs/src/contrib/bkjournal/target/lib.
{code}
I thought, copying of the respective bookkeeper server jar will help users not
to worry about the bookkeeper-server version. They can simply copy the
generated jar from this folder. Does this makes sense?
> Changes from BOOKKEEPER-203 broken capability of including bookkeeper-server
> jar in hidden package of BKJM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-4286
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4286
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Vinayakumar B
> Assignee: Rakesh R
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.5.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-4286.patch
>
>
> BOOKKEEPER-203 introduced changes to LedgerLayout to include
> ManagerFactoryClass instead of ManagerFactoryName.
> So because of this, BKJM cannot shade the bookkeeper-server jar inside BKJM
> jar
> LAYOUT znode created by BookieServer is not readable by the BKJM as it have
> classes in hidden packages. (same problem vice versa)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
