[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14064990#comment-14064990 ]
Rakesh R commented on HDFS-4266: -------------------------------- Yes [~ikelly], you are right. I think setting BookKeeper's 'addEntryTimeoutSec' to a higher value will avoid this ensemble reformation and will make the test case more reliable. What do you feel? > BKJM: Separate write and ack quorum > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-4266 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4266 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: ha > Reporter: Ivan Kelly > Assignee: Rakesh R > Attachments: 001-HDFS-4266.patch, 002-HDFS-4266.patch > > > BOOKKEEPER-208 allows the ack and write quorums to be different sizes to > allow writes to be unaffected by any bookie failure. BKJM should be able to > take advantage of this. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)