[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14064990#comment-14064990
]
Rakesh R commented on HDFS-4266:
--------------------------------
Yes [~ikelly], you are right. I think setting BookKeeper's 'addEntryTimeoutSec'
to a higher value will avoid this ensemble reformation and will make the test
case more reliable. What do you feel?
> BKJM: Separate write and ack quorum
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-4266
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4266
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: ha
> Reporter: Ivan Kelly
> Assignee: Rakesh R
> Attachments: 001-HDFS-4266.patch, 002-HDFS-4266.patch
>
>
> BOOKKEEPER-208 allows the ack and write quorums to be different sizes to
> allow writes to be unaffected by any bookie failure. BKJM should be able to
> take advantage of this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
