[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14078145#comment-14078145
 ] 

Arpit Agarwal edited comment on HDFS-6758 at 7/29/14 6:40 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

All test failures are unrelated.
# TestPipelinesFailover - HDFS-6694
# TestBlockRecovery, TestGenericRefresh, TestRefreshCallQueue - Filed HDFS-6768


was (Author: arpitagarwal):
All test failures are unrelated.
# TestPipelinesFailover - HDFS-6694
# TestGenericRefresh, TestRefreshCallQueue - Filed HDFS-6769
# TestBlockRecovery - Filed HDFS-6768

> block writer should pass the expected block size to DataXceiverServer
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6758
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6758
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: datanode, hdfs-client
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.1
>            Reporter: Arpit Agarwal
>            Assignee: Arpit Agarwal
>         Attachments: HDFS-6758.01.patch
>
>
> DataXceiver initializes the block size to the default block size for the 
> cluster. This size is later used by the FsDatasetImpl when applying 
> VolumeChoosingPolicy.
> {code}
>     block.setNumBytes(dataXceiverServer.estimateBlockSize);
> {code}
> where
> {code}
>   /**
>    * We need an estimate for block size to check if the disk partition has
>    * enough space. For now we set it to be the default block size set
>    * in the server side configuration, which is not ideal because the
>    * default block size should be a client-size configuration. 
>    * A better solution is to include in the header the estimated block size,
>    * i.e. either the actual block size or the default block size.
>    */
>   final long estimateBlockSize;
> {code}
> In most cases the writer can just pass the maximum expected block size to the 
> DN instead of having to use the cluster default.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to