[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14101348#comment-14101348
 ] 

Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on HDFS-6826:
--------------------------------------------

[~tucu00],
  I think we don't need to expose snapshotId. We can assume that this plugin 
will be invoked after the path has been resolved and INodeAuthorizationInfo is 
populated accordingly. The external implementations may not be able to track 
snapshotId, they should just use the full path.
 For example, in FsPermissionChecker, all we need from snapshotId is to find 
the right owner, group and permissions. If we pass the full path, along with 
INodeAuthorizationInfo populated with the owner, group and permissions for each 
intermediate inode, snapshotId is not needed.
  One possible way to implement this: Instead of having INode implement the 
INodeAuthorizationInfo interface, we could implement INodeAuthorizationInfo to 
encapsulate the snapshotId and the INode, and the method implementations would 
be just delegation to INode methods with snapshotId passed.

>A few comments on checkPermission API
  * snapshotId is not needed in the params as argued above.
  * boolean resolveLink should not be needed, because all resolution should be 
already done before this interface is invoked, also the plugins cannot be 
expected to resolve the links.

> Plugin interface to enable delegation of HDFS authorization assertions
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6826
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6826
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: security
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.1
>            Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur
>            Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur
>         Attachments: HDFS-6826-idea.patch, HDFS-6826-idea2.patch, 
> HDFS-6826v3.patch, HDFS-6826v4.patch, 
> HDFSPluggableAuthorizationProposal-v2.pdf, 
> HDFSPluggableAuthorizationProposal.pdf
>
>
> When Hbase data, HiveMetaStore data or Search data is accessed via services 
> (Hbase region servers, HiveServer2, Impala, Solr) the services can enforce 
> permissions on corresponding entities (databases, tables, views, columns, 
> search collections, documents). It is desirable, when the data is accessed 
> directly by users accessing the underlying data files (i.e. from a MapReduce 
> job), that the permission of the data files map to the permissions of the 
> corresponding data entity (i.e. table, column family or search collection).
> To enable this we need to have the necessary hooks in place in the NameNode 
> to delegate authorization to an external system that can map HDFS 
> files/directories to data entities and resolve their permissions based on the 
> data entities permissions.
> I’ll be posting a design proposal in the next few days.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to