[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14140364#comment-14140364 ]
Hudson commented on HDFS-6961: ------------------------------ SUCCESS: Integrated in Hadoop-Yarn-trunk #685 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Yarn-trunk/685/]) HDFS-6961. Archival Storage: BlockPlacementPolicy#chooseTarget should check each valid storage type in each choosing round. (jing9: rev e08701ec71f7c10d8f15122d90c35f9f22e40837) * hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/blockmanagement/BlockPlacementPolicyDefault.java * hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/TestBlockStoragePolicy.java * hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/BlockStoragePolicy.java * hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/blockmanagement/BlockManager.java * hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/DFSTestUtil.java * hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/blockmanagement/BlockPlacementPolicyWithNodeGroup.java > Archival Storage: BlockPlacementPolicy#chooseTarget should check each valid > storage type in each choosing round > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-6961 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6961 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: balancer, namenode > Reporter: Jing Zhao > Assignee: Jing Zhao > Attachments: HDFS-6961.000.patch, HDFS-6961.001.patch, > HDFS-6961.002.patch, HDFS-6961.002.patch, HDFS-6961.003.patch > > > Currently in each choosing round of BlockPlacementPolicy#chooseTarget (e.g., > round 1 for choosing local storage, round 2 for remote rack, etc.), we only > take into account the first storage type in the storage type list. This may > fail to choose the local machine or sometimes may even fail to choose enough > nodes. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)