[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14141592#comment-14141592
]
Yi Liu commented on HDFS-7073:
------------------------------
Thanks Chris, about {{ClientCache}}, you are right, I missed that.
The patch is OK for me, +1 (non-binding).
> Allow falling back to a non-SASL connection on DataTransferProtocol in
> several edge cases.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-7073
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7073
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: datanode, hdfs-client, security
> Reporter: Chris Nauroth
> Assignee: Chris Nauroth
> Attachments: HDFS-7073.1.patch, HDFS-7073.2.patch, HDFS-7073.3.patch
>
>
> HDFS-2856 implemented general SASL support on DataTransferProtocol. Part of
> that work also included a fallback mode in case the remote cluster is running
> under a different configuration without SASL. I've discovered a few edge
> case configurations that this did not support:
> * Cluster is unsecured, but has block access tokens enabled. This is not
> something I've seen done in practice, but I've heard historically it has been
> allowed. The HDFS-2856 code relied on seeing an empty block access token to
> trigger fallback, and this doesn't work if the unsecured cluster actually is
> using block access tokens.
> * The DataNode has an unpublicized testing configuration property that could
> be used to skip the privileged port check. However, the HDFS-2856 code is
> still enforcing requirement of SASL when the ports are not privileged, so
> this would force existing configurations to make changes to activate SASL.
> This patch will restore the old behavior so that these edge case
> configurations will continue to work the same way.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
