[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14155367#comment-14155367
 ] 

Konstantin Shvachko commented on HDFS-3107:
-------------------------------------------

[~cmccabe] feels like some clarification is needed from you here, so that we 
could avoid misunderstanding like in the other jira.

# I assume that your [veto of Sept 17 conditional on the design 
document|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3107?focusedCommentId=14137882&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14137882]
 had been addressed. Now with subsequent corrections in line with your 
suggestions.
# [Earlier this week you 
stated|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3107?focusedCommentId=14152094&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14152094]
??we should hold off on committing to trunk until we figure out the snapshot 
story.??
Given the design in place, the subtask HDFS-7056 opened, and the general 
acceptance of the approach by other contributors, the snapshot story seem to be 
clear.

So if your statement is a veto could you please clarify the reason(s)? If not 
please say so, so that people could proceed with the subtasks? I hope you can 
reply by tomorrow.

> HDFS truncate
> -------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-3107
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3107
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: datanode, namenode
>            Reporter: Lei Chang
>            Assignee: Plamen Jeliazkov
>         Attachments: HDFS-3107.patch, HDFS-3107.patch, HDFS-3107.patch, 
> HDFS-3107.patch, HDFS-3107.patch, HDFS_truncate.pdf, HDFS_truncate.pdf, 
> HDFS_truncate_semantics_Mar15.pdf, HDFS_truncate_semantics_Mar21.pdf, 
> editsStored
>
>   Original Estimate: 1,344h
>  Remaining Estimate: 1,344h
>
> Systems with transaction support often need to undo changes made to the 
> underlying storage when a transaction is aborted. Currently HDFS does not 
> support truncate (a standard Posix operation) which is a reverse operation of 
> append, which makes upper layer applications use ugly workarounds (such as 
> keeping track of the discarded byte range per file in a separate metadata 
> store, and periodically running a vacuum process to rewrite compacted files) 
> to overcome this limitation of HDFS.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to