[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14162629#comment-14162629
 ] 

Chris Nauroth commented on HDFS-7112:
-------------------------------------

bq. For asyncLazyPersistService, we will only call 
asyncLazyPersistService#addVolume when the storage type of the volume is 
RAM_DISK.

I see the volume will get added to {{asyncLazyPersistService}} if 
{{!storageType.isTransient()}}.  This would mean every "traditional" volume 
would get added, and therefore a thread would be allocated.  I think Arpit was 
pointing out that for existing deployments not using {{RAM_DISK}}, this would 
trigger allocation of additional unneeded threads.  Ideally, the non-transient 
volumes would only get added to {{asyncLazyPersistService}} if there is at 
least one {{RAM_DISK}} volume configured.  This way, the extra threads wouldn't 
be allocated in deployments that don't use any {{RAM_DISK}} volumes.

Aside from that, the patch looks good.  It appears that all other prior 
feedback from Arpit has been addressed.



> LazyWriter should use either async IO or one thread per physical disk
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-7112
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7112
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: datanode
>    Affects Versions: HDFS-6581
>            Reporter: Arpit Agarwal
>            Assignee: Xiaoyu Yao
>             Fix For: 2.6.0
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-7112.0.patch, HDFS-7112.1.patch, HDFS-7112.2.patch
>
>
> The LazyWriter currently uses synchronous IO and a single thread. This limits 
> the throughput to that of a single disk. Using either async overlapped IO or 
> one thread per physical disk will improve the write throughput.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to