My 2c: if it is not possible to move the i/o operations listFiles() and
length() outside the lock on FSVolumeSet, maybe set a flag that a block
report is in progress so that the rest of the datanode doesn't just
hang. 
 
Thanks,
Zlatin

________________________________

From: Dhruba Borthakur [mailto:dhr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 3:38 PM
To: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: Exponential performance decay - mystery solved


Some of this delay in generating block reports might be mitigated via
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-854 

thanks,
dhruba


On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:41 AM, <zlatin.balev...@barclayscapital.com>
wrote:




        Alright, the problem was caused by me setting the frequency of a
block
        report to 30 seconds.  The idea behind that was to create more
load on
        the Namenode, but I didn't notice that those block reports were
taking
        increasing amounts of time to generate.  During that time, a
lock was
        held which I'm guessing didn't allow the reporting datanode to
perform
        its functions.
        
        On my hardware, with 100,000 blocks the report takes over 7
seconds.  So
        every datanode was unavailable for 7 out of every 30 seconds.
Changing
        the interval to a more reasonable value restored the insertion
speed to
        linear.
        
        Apologies for creating this confusion, nevertheless it was a
useful
        thing to learn.
        
        Regards,
        Zlatin
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: Eli Collins [mailto:e...@cloudera.com]
        Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 2:02 PM
        To: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org
        Subject: Re: Exponential performance decay - possible lead
        
        >
        > The messages are of the following:
        >
        > 2010-01-18 14:51:25,694 WARN
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.StateChange:
        > BLOCK* NameSystem.addStoredBlock: Redundant addStoredBlock
request
        > received for blk_-5804440919363539694_1026 on
ip.removed:port.removed
        > size 1024
        
        This is odd, you should't be getting this warning, I don't see
it when
        running your benchmark on my cluster. Are there other
relevant/warnings
        errors in the NN or DN logs?
        
        Thanks,
        Eli
        _______________________________________________
        
        This e-mail may contain information that is confidential,
privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an
intended recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it
by any means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender
that you have received it in error. Unless specifically indicated, this
e-mail is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation to buy or sell
any securities, investment products or other financial product or
service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an official
statement of Barclays. Any views or opinions presented are solely those
of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Barclays. This
e-mail is subject to terms available at the following link:
www.barcap.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with Barclays you consent
to the foregoing.  Barclays Capital is the investment banking division
of Barclays Bank PLC, a company registered in England (number 1026167)
with its registered office at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP.  This
email may relate to or be sent from other members of the Barclays Group.
        _______________________________________________
        




-- 
Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba


_______________________________________________

This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or 
otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient of 
this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please delete it 
and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it in error. 
Unless specifically indicated, this e-mail is not an offer to buy or sell or a 
solicitation to buy or sell any securities, investment products or other 
financial product or service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or 
an official statement of Barclays. Any views or opinions presented are solely 
those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Barclays. This 
e-mail is subject to terms available at the following link: 
www.barcap.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with Barclays you consent to the 
foregoing.  Barclays Capital is the investment banking division of Barclays 
Bank PLC, a company registered in England (number 1026167) with its registered 
office at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP.  This email may relate to or be 
sent from other members of the Barclays Group.
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to