Hi Yes we are using append Thanks shawn for the link http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7997587/under-replicated-blocks-count-is-inaccurate-buy-why
But currently we are using Branch-2 (Is Branch-2 append is also unstable). I didnt check FSCK "-openforwrite" if the cluster is still up I will check and update u guys and 2. The NN UI is reporting missing blocks and on clicking the link there are no missing blocks displayed, but FSCK displays no missing blocks. For this point I got a clue where missing blocks are displayed based on number of entries in QUEUE_WITH_CORRUPT_BLOCKS, and link didn't display any blocks since the entry in QUEUE_WITH_CORRUPT_BLOCKS is not having a entry in CorruptReplicasMap. Is there any possibility of having this scenario? Thanks and Regards Amith ________________________________ From: Todd Lipcon [t...@cloudera.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 2:50 AM To: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Several Inconsistencies between fsck and NN UI reports Hi Amith, Did you try fsck with the "-openforwrite" flag? -Todd On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Amith D K <amit...@huawei.com<mailto:amit...@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi All, In one of our test cluster we have seen several Inconsistencies in between NN UI and FSCK report. 1. The number of under replicated blocks in UI and FSCK are not matching 2. The NN UI is reporting missing blocks and on clicking the link there are no missing blocks displayed, but FSCK displays no missing blocks. All the cluster are running on Branch-2. This is a simple NN setup with 3 DN. Did any one face the same problem till now? Thanks and Regards Amith -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera
