No, HDFS was 50% free. Decommission about a third of the 250 TB successfully at the end.
From: tong....@rms.com To: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 09:42:00 -0700 Subject: RE: Rack decommission Is it possible because there is no available empty blocks in the cluster to be used for replication? From: David Ginzburg [mailto:ginz...@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 3:30 AM To: HDFS USER mail list Subject: RE: Rack decommission Thank you, I am a bit confused about the meaning of the state -"Blocks With No Live Replicas". Could not find documentation. Can you clarify? Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 10:44:07 -0500 Subject: Re: Rack decommission From: ravihad...@gmail.com To: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org Hi David, > If a DN is decommissioned and returns, Does the NM update it's block meta > data. If it does, How does it decide when to update the meta data map? I presume you meant "the NN update it's block meta data". The answer is yes. Soon as the NN decides that a node is dead / decommissioned and that blocks have / will fallen below their replication factor, it will order more replications. This is what is going to happen when you decommission the nodes. When the DNs come back, and they report their blocks to the NN, the NN will realise that the blocks are over-replicated and will order deletions. > When I view the "dfsnodelist.jsp?whatNodes= DECOMMISSIONING" page, there are many slaves with "Blocks With No Live Replicas" Obviously depends on how loaded your HDFS was. On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:04 AM, David Ginzburg <ginz...@hotmail.com> wrote: Hi, I have began decommissioning the servers in the rack. When I view the "dfsnodelist.jsp?whatNodes=DECOMMISSIONING" page, there are many slaves with "Blocks With No Live Replicas" Is it possible , even if I have rack awareness configured ? From: ginz...@hotmail.com To: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org; common-u...@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Rack decommission Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 11:49:41 +0000 Hi, I have a cluster with 4 racks. I am scheduled to replace one of them, with slave servers included. The cluster is configured with rack awareness and replication factor is 3. It is my understanding that on rack aware clusters, block placement policy ensures blocks are at least on two racks. I am concerned about decommission of whole rack. I considered decommission each node in the rack separately and let it balance automatically , but I am afraid it will take a lot of time. If a DN is decommissioned and returns, Does the NM update it's block meta data. If it does, How does it decide when to update the meta data map? Is there a suggested way to decommission a whole rack , I may have missed? This message and any attachments contain information that may be RMS Inc. confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the intended recipient), and have received this message in error, any use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to the e-mail and permanently deleting the message from your computer and/or storage system.
