>________________________________
> From: Subroto <ssan...@datameer.com>
>To: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org 
>Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 4:34 AM
>Subject: Change in behavior of public FileStatus[] globStatus(Path 
>pathPattern, PathFilter filter)
> 
>
>Hi,
>
>
>I was running a simple unit test for verifying the behavior of a/m API. 
>The UT is some thing like this:
>
>
>public void testResolve_SimpleGlob() throws IOException {
>        File folder = _tempFolder.newFolder("folder");
>        File file1 = createFile(folder, "2010/test1");
>        File file2 = createFile(folder, "2011/test1");
>        File file3 = createFile(folder, "2011/test2");
>
>
>//some java code to assert
>// fileSystem.globStatus(new Path((folder.getAbsolutePath() + "/20*/test1")) 
>contains path for file1 and file2
>// fileSystem.globStatus(new Path((folder.getAbsolutePath() + "/20*/test*")) 
>contains path for file1, file2 and file3
>// fileSystem.globStatus(new Path((folder.getAbsolutePath() + "/2011/*")) 
>contains path for file2 and file3
>// fileSystem.globStatus(new Path((folder.getAbsolutePath() + "/2012/*")) is 
>empty 
>    }
>
>
>The fourth assertion use to work fine in cdh3u3 version but, recently while 
>running the same test with cdh4b2, I encountered:
>java.io.FileNotFoundException: File 
>/var/folders/4w/yr852nyj3dbd1qj4w6qcwtqm0000gn/T/junit406694769891587251/folder/2012
> does not exist
>at 
>org.apache.hadoop.fs.RawLocalFileSystem.listStatus(RawLocalFileSystem.java:315)
>at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.listStatus(FileSystem.java:1249)
>at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.listStatus(FileSystem.java:1289)
>at 
>org.apache.hadoop.fs.ChecksumFileSystem.listStatus(ChecksumFileSystem.java:557)
>at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.listStatus(FileSystem.java:1249)
>at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.listStatus(FileSystem.java:1326)
>at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.globStatusInternal(FileSystem.java:1456)
>at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.globStatus(FileSystem.java:1411)
>at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.globStatus(FileSystem.java:1389)
>
>
>Is this an intentional change made or shall we need to file it as bug and fix 
>it…. ?
>
>
>Cheers,
>Subroto Sanyal
>
>

Reply via email to