Right, so we are on the right track--hdrgen no longer rejects the RSP.
Next question is: how good is the RSP? Try plotting it. If it is smooth
and monotonic, without any kinks in it, it's a good one. Otherwise, try
generating it from a different sequence. The 5D is used a lot on WebHDR:
http://www.jaloxa.eu/webhdr/cameras/Canon__Canon_EOS_5D.shtml
How does your RSP compare with the averaged one? Note that there is no
quality control, and even 'wonky' ones make it into the average.
Axel
On 05/13/2013 09:21 PM, Michael Martinez wrote:
Using a 4 in front of the Photosphere numbers like this:
4 7.135383e-03 -3.556814e-02 2.441168e+00 -5.786777e+00 4.462320e+00
4 4.543790e-03 3.363440e-02 1.917460e+00 -4.660105e+00 3.792747e+00
4 3.956902e-03 3.244581e-02 1.827308e+00 -4.505138e+00 3.729707e+00
unfortunately results in a wonky HDR with garbage luminance values and
strage visual artifacts - see screen shot here
<https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/28677369/Screen%20shot%202013-05-13%20at%201.17.33%20PM.png>.
compared to a screenshot of the photosphere created HDR
<https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/28677369/Screen%20shot%202013-05-13%20at%201.17.55%20PM.png>
On May 13, 2013, at 1:05 PM, Axel Jacobs wrote:
Oops,
try '4 ', not '6 ' as per my last post.
Embarrassingly yours
_______________________________________________
HDRI mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/hdri
