Just a request to make reading posts easier -- please do NOT include an entire digest with your post.
Write what you have to say at the beginning, and paste in whatever *relevant* information people might want who haven't been following the recent conversation. As a general rule, keep it short and sweet and avoid a lot of redundant information. Thanks! -Greg > From: gs33070 <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [HDRI] HDRI Digest, Vol 70, Issue 4 > Date: April 20, 2014 9:16:36 PM PDT >> *********************************** > > Dear Lars: > > Thank you for your proposed alternatives. Webhdr is a great, user friendly > tool and I was not aware of that. > I have one more question regarding the calibration. > > V. Kumaragurubaran and M. Inanici have proposed two methods for calibration. > one is based on measuring the absolute luminance of the graycard and the > other one is based one measuring the illuminance at the camera level in the > scene that they suggest it for special cases such as sun and sky capture. > > I am doing daylight research in an office area with alternative shadings > (artificial lighting is off during the study). > Is using the Illuminance calibration that utilizes captured illuminance of > the camera level with the handhold illuminance meter (proposed in hdrscope) a > correct way of calibrating the HDR photos In my case? > > Regards > Fatemeh > M.ARCH > UNIVERSITY PUTRA MALAYSIA > _______________________________________________ HDRI mailing list [email protected] http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/hdri
