I think we should keep this sort of pre-validation,
At the moment, we have valid, and valid each line at the moment, pre-valid may let import faster, but let code more complicated, maybe not worth. https://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/health/rev/0c5430870e3e -- 发自我的网易邮箱手机智能版 <br/><br/><br/> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Luis Falcon" <invalid.nore...@gnu.org> To: "Feng Shu" <tuma...@163.com>, "Gerald Wiese" <wi...@gnuhealth.org>, "Luis Falcon" <fal...@gnuhealth.org>, health-dev@gnu.org Sent: Sun, 3 Mar 2024 06:25:54 -0500 (EST) Subject: [bug #65387] Issues with the new unified importer Update of bug #65387 (group health): Status: None => In Progress Release: None => 4.4.0 _______________________________________________________ Follow-up Comment #5: Great! I think is a good idea to keep both name and code, since depending on the lab analyzer or laboratory will deliver one or the other. As a side note, the original script validated the existance of the labtest itself. The program would about if the lab test did not exist. I think we should keep this sort of pre-validation, but we can discuss it in other thread :) Bests _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65387> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
