On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 23:26 -0500, William L. Jarrold wrote: > On Sat, 28 May 2005, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > > For the rumination study, all items are presented in random order. It > > occurs to me that you might not want to present both the reversed and > > unreversed versions of the same item. FYI, it would be easy to code > > this change. > > Awesmone dude! Yes, would be v v helpful. > > We are prolly gonna want other kinds of control too. e.g. percentage of > rule vs gafs vs deduction vs justified deduction, etc etc.
In that case, you need to put both the rev & unrev statement in the same "item group". For example, old style: GROUND UNREV The river Danube is a river. GROUND REV The river Danube is not a river. And new style: GROUND UNREV The river Danube is a river. REV The river Danube is not a river.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Heartlogic-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/heartlogic-dev
