On Sun, 29 May 2005, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
1. I've updated the items according to the wiki.
awesome.
2. You will not be asked both reversed and unreversed versions of a
statement.
great.
hrm, checking for bugs in this is going to be hard to do. will require
lots of test trials and lots of anality. guess what? it won't get
thoroughly tested!!! (-:
if there is a bug in something complex like this hopefully we will find
it in the data. yes, i suppose the best way to find bugs like this
is to make queries to our data. e.g. make a query like this "give me
all subjects and all itmes such that that subject has seen the reversed
and unreversed version of that item." if we get any hits for a query
like that we know there is a bug.
bill
--
If you are an American then support http://fairtax.org
(Permanently replace 50,000+ pages of tax law with about 200 pages.)
_______________________________________________
Heartlogic-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/heartlogic-dev
