On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 19:05 -0500, William L. Jarrold wrote: > Okay, wow there is lots of text associated with OperationJoshuaGoal. It > looks impressive. I have many detailed reactions. Part of me > just wants to go at it and edit away. But I don't want to do an > edit that you do not like. Yes, yes, we get the email saying what > has changed but it can be hard to quickly grok and I do not completey > trust it. Thus, I would not want you heavily editing something that > I feel some sort of ownership of....An alternative is for me to propose > edits and get permission to make them. > > I am also REALLY liking this wiki business. Aren't you?
The wiki is working much better than I expected. > For example, we > have a lot of text associated with Op Joshua Goal and it won't be hard to > turn it into a paper. Agreed. When I get frustrated with you, I have often thought that, "To hell with Bill, I have enough material to write a conference paper. I'll just do that!" > So, which do you prefer? I think we have to slog through things one step at a time. Despite my frustration, I acknowledge that your feedback has helped me clarify my thinking and improved my presentation dramatically.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Heartlogic-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/heartlogic-dev
