On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 00:05 -0500, William L. Jarrold wrote: > Joshua, > > I adopted the following from my dissertation... > > Suppose a boy wants some orange juice. At bedtime his dad makes him > some hot chocolate. Marvin believes the boy would be happy because > the boy did not get what he wanted. > > ...or worst case, easiest to implement option is to just treatm this > like a normal item. In which case, our participants would see... > > Marvin the robot believes: > > <i>Suppose a boy wants some orange juice. At bedtime his dad makes him > some hot chocolate. Marvin believes the boy would be happy because > the boy did not get what he wanted.</i> > > Rate the believability of the statement. > > ...of course that is suboptimal.
Yah, that's bad because the introductory suppositions are not meant to be rated. > So can we special case these? Here > is what might fly... No problem. The database is designed for storing trees, just like this. In fact, you probably want to separate the affect and the reason also. > Suppose the following is true: > > A boy wants some orange juice. At bedtime his dad makes him some hot > chocolate. > > Marvin the robot believes: > > The boy would be happy because the boy did not get what he > wanted. > > Rate the believability of that statement. Just keep things on separate lines in your file.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Heartlogic-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/heartlogic-dev
