Bedi’avad has no reference to another entry. There is no such a word in ES as Di’avad.
There is also no reference in Bahem (or Bahen) With Bilvad – There is a reference to Levad – so I would not change it to Bilvad, but leave it as Bi-levad. The same is with Ka’et – there is a reference to ‘Et There is no reference in Kefi (and also Lefi), Levad, There is no reference to Ma’an in Lema’an But there are references to Min from Mi-meni, Mi-menah, Mi-meno and so on. (those I would continue to hyphen) Seli, shelkha, shelak and so on, do not have prefixes. I am heading home ☺ Yossi –– Joseph (Yossi) Galron-Goldschläger Head, Hebraica & Jewish Studies Library<http://guides.osu.edu/c.php?g=337806&p=2274681> and German Language and Literature Librarian 305 G Thompson Memorial Library The Ohio State University Libraries 1858 Neil Ave. Mall Columbus, Ohio 43210 USA Tel.: (614) 292-3362, Fax: (614)292-1918 Mobile: (614) 285-4290 E-Mail: galro...@osu.edu or jgal...@gmail.com Lexicon of Modern Hebrew Literature: http://go.osu.edu/hebrewlit Union List of Digitized Jewish Historic Newspapers and Periodicals http://go.osu.edu/jpress From: Shinohara, Jasmin <jsh...@pobox.upenn.edu> Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2019 2:01 PM To: Galron, Joseph <galro...@osu.edu>; Hebrew Name Authority Funnel <heb-naco@lists.osu.edu> Subject: RE: בגלל I hear the concern, Yossi, but I’m afraid we’ve already started down the proverbial slope. Per the FAQ<http://rascat.pbworks.com/w/page/109347700/Romanization%20FAQ>, we’ve agreed to romanize the words as Bediʻavad Bahem Bilvad Kaʻet Kefi Levad Lemaʻan Lefi Mimeni Sheli No one can argue for Shvil since the sheva na’ at the beginning of a word requires it to be Shevil. No one can argue for Birushalayim because there is no E-Sh. entry for the compound. So do I hear consensus on Biglal (and Bishvil – when it means “because/on behalf of”; otherwise bi/ba-shevil when it means “on a/the path)? From: Heb-naco [mailto:heb-naco-boun...@lists.osu.edu] On Behalf Of Galron, Joseph via Heb-naco Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2019 12:52 PM To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] בגלל It is “dangerous” going to Biglal or Bishvil – tomorrow we will say: If it is Bishvil so why not change it to Shvil We also Romanize בירושלים to “Bi-Yerushalayim” and not to “Birushalayim” Yossi From: Heb-naco <heb-naco-boun...@lists.osu.edu<mailto:heb-naco-boun...@lists.osu.edu>> On Behalf Of Shinohara, Jasmin via Heb-naco Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2019 12:31 PM To: Gottschalk, Haim <h...@loc.gov<mailto:h...@loc.gov>>; 'Hebrew Name Authority Funnel' <heb-naco@lists.osu.edu<mailto:heb-naco@lists.osu.edu>> Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] בגלל Hi, Haim, bi-gelal would be correct if the ב is considered a prefix to the word גלל. But since there is a direct entry for the word as a whole, I’m asking if we should romanize it as a whole word instead of as a compound word. Thanks, Jasmin From: Gottschalk, Haim [mailto:h...@loc.gov] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2019 12:24 PM To: Shinohara, Jasmin; 'Hebrew Name Authority Funnel' Subject: RE: בגלל I think it should be “biglal” and not “bi-gelal” because of the sheva being treat as a sheva nach (which is how it is in the Alcalay). This is in my humble opinion. ~Haim From: Heb-naco <heb-naco-boun...@lists.osu.edu<mailto:heb-naco-boun...@lists.osu.edu>> On Behalf Of Shinohara, Jasmin via Heb-naco Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2019 11:00 AM To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel <heb-naco@lists.osu.edu<mailto:heb-naco@lists.osu.edu>> Subject: [Heb-NACO] בגלל Hello Collective Wisdom, please remind me: if there’s an entry in E-Sh., even if it ends with a “see also”, is that sufficient justification for romanizing the word as a word as opposed to a compound? E.g. בגלל has a direct entry, so I’d think it would be romanized biglal (NOT bigelal because as a whole word, the sheva would be considered merahef, ignored in romanization), but the entry also says “see גלל”. So which is it: Biglal or Bi-gelal? Thanks, Jasmin --- Jasmin Shinohara Hebraica Cataloging Librarian University of Pennsylvania Van Pelt-Dietrich Library Center 3420 Walnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19104-6206 T. 215-746-6397 jsh...@upenn.edu<mailto:jsh...@upenn.edu>
_______________________________________________ Heb-naco mailing list Heb-naco@lists.osu.edu https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
