About #1091807807 I can say that this is not the same record as exists in our catalog. Our record is not hybrid and is correctly coded HEB (as well as $$e rda, which has dropped off the OCLC record). We have a 264#1 and not a 260 and, as evidenced by the 751, the place of publication is Tel Aviv and not, as in the OCLC record, Bnei Brak. The Hebrew year in the NLI record has been removed from the OCLC version. Not only has the 300 been put into English and no longer RDA compatible, the 2 unnumbered pages on our record have been removed. Our record has no 090. The $$2 in the 33X fields are not original – we never use a suffix of /heb.
Aside from the $$2, #1103962116 seems to be our record. I've looked over our correspondence with agencies and this is not a record we have ever discussed with any vendor. It seems that some cataloger within the US community is creating this confusion. As I said at AJL during the discussion of problematic records with parallel fields which presumably originated from NLI, I am more than willing to help with the detective work but, all other things being equal, the better bet is that a vendor or US cataloger did something odd to the record rather than NLI creating a hybrid record. - Ahava [cid:[email protected]]<http://www.nli.org.il/> Dr. Ahava Cohen |Head Hebrew Catalogue Department Mobile: +972-54-549-3644 Tel.: +972-74-733-6231 The National Library of Israel, Jerusalem [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> | www.nli.org.il<http://web.nli.org.il/sites/NLI/English/Pages/default.aspx> [cid:[email protected]]<http://www.facebook.com/NationalLibraryIsrael> [cid:[email protected]] <http://www.youtube.com/user/NLI2010/featured> [cid:[email protected]] <http://instagram.com/nli_israel> [cid:[email protected]] <http://www.flickr.com/photos/64126959@N03/collections/> From: Heb-naco [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Neil Manel Frau-Cortes via Heb-naco Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 3:46 PM To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel Subject: [Heb-NACO] question regarding apparently duplicated NLI records Hi, I am finding some records whose first author is J9U, the National Library, encoded as [040 heb] but in fact their fields are in English. In parallel, there is another record for the same entirely in Hebrew. I know my explanation is confusing... Please take a minute and check #1103962116 and #1091807807 It is unclear what was originally ton #1091807807 and what has been added by others. My conundrum is that I can't just anglicize the NLI record, but I am not understanding what's going on. I figure either NLI is now producing some records encoded ENG, or some catalogers are hybridizing these records. In any case --as a temporary exception-- I created a 3rd record entirely in English. Depending on your answer, I will go ahead and merge whatever needs to be merged. Your advice is much appreciated. This is not something I see often, but it is not a unique situation. -- Neil M. Frau-Cortes, Ph.D. (he, him, his) Judaica, Hebraica and Metadata Cataloger University of Maryland 4109 McKeldin Library College Park, MD 20742 Phone (301) 405-9337 [email protected]<http://[email protected]> ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1881-1405
_______________________________________________ Heb-naco mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
