Caroline,
This book reminds of a similar title — The Bible Came from Arabia by Kamal
Salibi, published in 1985. The catalogue record has many subject headings,
but none mentioning controversial works or Anti-Jewish works.
Unless it’s polemical and makes disparaging remarks about Jews, the heading
anti-Jewish works isn’t justified. Neither is Bible — Controversial works
for that matter. IMO. But I haven’t seen the book.
Best wishes,
Barry

On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 9:15 PM Miller, Caroline via Heb-naco <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hevre, I hope you all had a meaningful Shemini Atzeret and Simchat Torah.
> It was pretty rough remembering what happened last year at that time. I had
> a question come to me about the new RBMS genre term “Anti-Jewish works. ”
> Are any
>
> Hevre,
>
>
>
> I hope you all had a meaningful Shemini Atzeret and Simchat Torah.  It was
> pretty rough remembering what happened last year at that time.
>
>
>
> I had a question come to me about the new RBMS genre term “Anti-Jewish
> works
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/rbmscv/cv00114.html__;!!KGKeukY!1map94X23H5rBrTwKX0t_-T_IBb4N6S1Tl-L15N2VJHgrMuVoJjz9UKEja8an2L7AmUJyA6fM9pbthUQWixFsZ6tAQSr4g$>.”
> Are any of you using this term?  If so, for what type of materials?  Our
> Alma/Primo system lets us use any authoritative controlled vocabulary
> terms.
>
>
>
> We got a copy of the Mecca Bible (OCLC #1428496967).  Here is the Amazon
> description
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.amazon.com/Mecca-Bible-Treasured-History-Ancient/dp/B0CSZ6YQFR__;!!KGKeukY!1map94X23H5rBrTwKX0t_-T_IBb4N6S1Tl-L15N2VJHgrMuVoJjz9UKEja8an2L7AmUJyA6fM9pbthUQWixFsZ64Vte3-A$>.
> I reviewed the book with my copy cataloger to come up with the 630 0 0
> Bible. $p Old Testament $ Controversial Literature and left it at that.  He
> later decided it needed the RBMS genre term “Anti-Jewish works” and added
> it to the record.  The book considers itself an “academic” book documenting
> that the Israelites weren’t even in the place they claimed to be at the
> time of the Bible and that they were dispersed and Hebrew fell out of use.
> It was offensive to me personally when I read it but I’m not sure it
> constitutes an anti-Jewish work based on the scope note of the term.
>
>
>
> I would appreciate your thoughts.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Caroline
>
>
>
> *Caroline R. Miller*
>
> Team Leader, Discovery Team
>
> Hebraica/Judaica Catalog Librarian
>
> UCLA Library Resource Acquisitions and Metadata Services
>
> 2400 Life Sciences Building
>
> 621 Charles E Young Drive South
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.google.com/maps/search/621*Charles*E*Young*Drive*South?entry=gmail&source=g__;KysrKys!!KGKeukY!xNI_yloT9V2XOuWL7PQT83RopGqBYlhkBn3ZtZRZ0Oxa_GtK2IEQEMmBxrW8HTSIC1N_PO1rNN2ehz9s3rDtEe9l3EGoKDM$
>  >
>
> Box 957230
>
> Los Angeles, CA  90095-7230
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Heb-naco mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
>
_______________________________________________
Heb-naco mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco

Reply via email to