> 1. I've documented the use of YYEOF, yylval, and yylloc in semantic
> actions. Was this intentionally omitted before? Why?
Nah, just never got around to it, I guess.
> +During deterministic @acronym{GLR} operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR}
> is
> +similar to its effect in an @acronym{LALR}(1) parser.
It would be better to say "the same as" or "identical to" rather than
"similar to", because any deviations are unintentional (i.e., bugs).
> +In a deferred semantic action, its effect is currently not well tested.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
> +
Let's say instead
In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
> +Note that it is also possible to access the semantic value of the look-ahead
> +token, if any, from a semantic action.
> +This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
OK, call me picky, but I *REALLY* dislike the phrase "note that", and
would prefer
Within a semantic action, the semantic value of the look-ahead
token, if any, is available in @code{yylval}.
> +Note that it is also possible to access the location of the look-ahead
> token,
> +if any, from a semantic action.
> +This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
Likewise,
Within a semantic action, the location of the look-ahead
token, if any, is available in @code{yylloc}.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
