Thanks Akim. I thought so too.
satya.
On 3/31/07, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le 30 mars 07 à 18:38, Satya a écrit :
> Yes, I meant to rewrite print.c too. But I did not understand why I
> have to implement any grammar productions for for this. All output is
> generated from internal data structures and there is nothing to be
> 'parsed' inorder to generate this output.
If you refer to
The candidate will have to:
+ Define an XML grammar for Bison reports
then it meant an XML schema for Bison reports. Not a Bison grammar.
--
"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the
opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth."
(Niels Bohr)
--
http://cs.uic.edu/~spopuri
_______________________________________________
[email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
