Hi, Did I imagine it, or did I read somewhere that one of the suggested improvements of Bison was to make it produce LR(1) parsers, as LALR(1) is used because they produce smaller tables, but now the memory restriction is not so great, it is not as necessary to use LALR?
Thanks. Rob _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
