Le 30 sept. 07 à 09:00, Joel E. Denny a écrit :
"foo::", etc.?
This seems like an error to me.
Sure! But who should catch it? Should we accept a leading ::?
Other than that, isn't it just a matter of splitting on "::"? Am I
forgetting something?
No, I don't think you do, it's just that if we start looking at
what it contains, someday someone might complain that we generated
invalid C++ code instead of rejecting invalid prefixes. And since
you always did things perfectly well, I suspected you might want
to go for it :)
BTW, for a start it might be very useful to use a syncline just
before the prefix uses.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
