>>> "MK" == Matthias Kramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> state 1
> 4 EXPRESSION: T_IDENTIFIER . '(' EXPRESSION ')'
> 5 | T_IDENTIFIER . [$end, T_IDENTIFIER, ';', '(', ')', "++",
> "--", '+', '-', '/']
> '(' shift, and go to state 5
> '(' [reduce using rule 5 (EXPRESSION)]
> $default reduce using rule 5 (EXPRESSION)
> Is there some way to tell bison to prefer shifting to reducing in this
> case?
Yes, sure. S/R is a conflict bw a rule (reduce) and a token (shift).
Since you want the shift here, the token must have precedence over the
rule (or both have the same precedence but right associativity).
The rule is labeled by T_IDENTIFIER, so you can just state that
%nonassoc T_IDENTIFIER
%nonassoc '('
to get what you want, use use %prec to label the rule with some other
precedence/associativity token.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
