On 6 Feb 2013, at 11:32, John P. Hartmann <jphartm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Isn't the point that <> are brackets (parentheses) in this context. > Clearly the lexer must determine this and emit an appropriate token. The ">>" token is context dependent, so the parser might set that context in a variable which the lexer reads, and if it is set, emits two ">" in two successive calls. > On 6 February 2013 10:14, Hans Aberg <haber...@telia.com> wrote: >> On 6 Feb 2013, at 00:54, Adam Smalin <acidzombi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> This doesn't help :( I see >> is in the lexer (search SHL) which means >>> List<List<int>> will not compile because >> is a right shift. But i looked >>> in the y file first and well... like i said its a C++ problem so C++ >>> obviously would suffer from it. >> >> Have you tried the other way around: sorting out ">>" in the actions? But >> otherwise, there might be somebody out there already having solved this. >> >>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Hans Aberg <haber...@telia.com> wrote: >>> On 15 Jan 2013, at 03:48, Adam Smalin <acidzombi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> As we know in C++ there is a issue... >>> >>> >>> You might inquiry in the Usenet newsgroup comp.compilers. There is a >>> Yaccable C++ grammar for an older revision, it may not have been updated. >>> http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/yaccable-grammar.html >>> >>> Hans _______________________________________________ help-bison@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
